Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yexin Ma vs Erika Sema Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ma vs Sema analysis and find out who is favored!
Yexin Ma vs Erika Sema Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ma has won 46.18% of points on his second serve, while Sema has won 43.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ma, in recent form, has won 54.1% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sema has won 58.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.22% and 42.65% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ma has saved 52.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sema has saved 53.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ma has won 59.74% of matches played (W/L 46/ 31), with Sema winning 57.81% (W/L 37/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ma has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 70% (W/L 7/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 177/ 149). Sema has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 353/ 285), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 15/ 21).
- Player level: In the last year, Ma has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.43% of matches (W/L 43/ 27), where as Sema has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.81% of matches (W/L 37/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Ma winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Ma winning 4 and Sema winning 2. The last match between Ma and Sema was at the W100 Tokyo, 25-04-2024, Second, Hard with Yexin Ma getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ma and Sema have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ma winning 0 times and Sema 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ma winning 0, and Sema 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ma has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.31 while Sema has played against players with an average rank of 248.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ma has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sema has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ma has converted 49.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sema has converted 54.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ma 2 - 1 Sema
177
Rank
177
High
24
Age
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
425
Rank
114
High
35
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
56% (242-193)
Career Total W/L
52% (456-414)
55% (17-14)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$70,005
Career Prize Money
$117,356
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Yexin Ma | Erika Sema |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 28 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:40 | 1:25:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (94/153) | 72% (132/183) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (64/94) | 61% (80/132) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (28/59) | 37% (19/51) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (10/21) | 73% (8/11) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (84/183) | 40% (61/153) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Yexin Ma
Player
Erika Sema
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Erika Sema
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
84%
(
51 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Yexin Ma
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yexin Ma | Erika Sema |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (17/14) | 57% (12/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (38/34) | 55% (27/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (351/343) | 54% (224/192) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 54% (14/12) | 60% (12/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 41 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 114 | 37 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:19 | 1:37:31 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 275.9 | 216.52 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1228/2222) | 75% (957/1272) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (762/1228) | 59% (567/957) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (459/994) | 45% (143/315) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (134/272) | 55% (84/153) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1023/2257) | 47% (584/1238) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (16/13) | 57% (12/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (17/31) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (17/13) | 85% (13/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (17/4) | 15% (13/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 13% (8/1) |
Yexin Ma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Yexin Ma
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
65%
(
11 of
17)
Break Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
54%
(
50 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
55 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Eden Silva
55%
(
85 of
155)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
49%
(
34 of
70)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
72 of
155)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
131
Total Points Won
132
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Yexin Ma
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Maddison Inglis
58%
(
76 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
13
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
48 of
74)
31%
(
17 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
47%
(
61 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
57 of
121)
126
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arianne Hartono
Player
Yexin Ma
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Yexin Ma
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
63%
(
70 of
112)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(2) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Erika Sema
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Arianne Hartono
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Erika Sema Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lisa-Marie Rioux
Player
Erika Sema
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
52%
(
32 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Erika Sema
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
78%
(
36 of
46)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Yuki Naito
78%
(
71 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
105)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yexin Ma
Player
Erika Sema
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Aoi Ito
78%
(
63 of
81)
1st Serve %
81%
(
65 of
80)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Sema
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
73%
(
72 of
98)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Momoko Kobori
Player
Erika Sema
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Erika Sema
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
30 of
39)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ma Vs Sema Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
